In a spectacle typical of far-left punditry, Whoopi Goldberg unleashed her latest tirade during the October 21 episode of ABC’s “The View,” targeting none other than billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. Her outrage stemmed from Musk’s ambitious initiative to support conservative candidates ahead of the upcoming November elections. In an attempt to boost participation in his America PAC, Musk announced he would give away $1 million a day until Election Day to individuals who sign a petition advocating for the First and Second Amendments.

This initiative, launched on October 19, caught the attention of many, particularly in key battleground states like Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona. Musk explained that this giveaway was designed to capture media attention that he believes the mainstream press will overlook, stating, “Otherwise, the legacy media won’t report on it.” Ironically, this strategy worked like a charm, as it triggered Goldberg’s latest freak-out.

“People keep trying to buy the election,” she fumed, launching into a tirade that epitomizes the liberal perspective on wealthy individuals influencing politics. “Billionaire Elon Musk has gone all in for you know who,” she continued, implying Musk’s financial backing for conservative candidates. The irony of her complaint about “buying elections” was lost on her, given the long history of wealthy liberals doing just that—think of George Soros or Tom Steyer.

Goldberg then transitioned into a legalistic critique, claiming that Musk’s giveaways were somehow illegal, referring to them as a “loophole.” “Now I thought that was against the law, but apparently they found some new loop stuff that allowed this to go on,” she ranted. While she expressed confusion over campaign finance laws, it’s important to note that this initiative is well within the legal framework governing PACs and their fundraising activities.

Adding fuel to the fire, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, a guest on the show, absurdly connected Musk’s giveaway to former President Donald Trump, suggesting that the billionaire’s actions were a distraction because Trump supposedly lacks a public policy plan. Walz ranted about a non-existent economic plan for the middle class, claiming it was indicative of a broader failure to address issues like reproductive rights and climate change.

This convoluted logic exemplifies the lengths to which Democrats will go to undermine the validity of alternative perspectives. Instead of engaging with the actual issues Musk is raising about First and Second Amendment rights, Walz and Goldberg deflected to familiar talking points designed to evoke outrage rather than substantive discussion.